<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Liam Nickerson</title> <atom:link href="http://web50.ca/2009/11/liam-nickerson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://web50.ca/2009/11/liam-nickerson/</link> <description>Canada&#039;s Best Websites</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:16:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Jeffrey</title><link>http://web50.ca/2009/11/liam-nickerson/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link> <dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:59:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://web50.ca/?p=634#comment-249</guid> <description>Liam&#039;s work is beautiful, pleasantly twisted and inspiring. The rest of his portfolio and personal musings attest to that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liam&#8217;s work is beautiful, pleasantly twisted and inspiring. The rest of his portfolio and personal musings attest to that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Web50 Judges</title><link>http://web50.ca/2009/11/liam-nickerson/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link> <dc:creator>Web50 Judges</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:46:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://web50.ca/?p=634#comment-173</guid> <description>Great question Broacher. We typically look at the proportion of Flash used on the site. It comes down to a judgment call. It seems like almost every site these days uses at least a bit of Flash, so if it&#039;s just used as an accent we don&#039;t put it in the Flash category. With this site, there is obviously a heavy reliance on Flash, but also quite a bit of it done in HTML/CSS (it&#039;s not a &quot;full-Flash&quot; site). So we put it in both categories.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question Broacher. We typically look at the proportion of Flash used on the site. It comes down to a judgment call. It seems like almost every site these days uses at least a bit of Flash, so if it&#8217;s just used as an accent we don&#8217;t put it in the Flash category. With this site, there is obviously a heavy reliance on Flash, but also quite a bit of it done in HTML/CSS (it&#8217;s not a &#8220;full-Flash&#8221; site). So we put it in both categories.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Broacher</title><link>http://web50.ca/2009/11/liam-nickerson/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link> <dc:creator>Broacher</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:33:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://web50.ca/?p=634#comment-172</guid> <description>Why does this site come up in the &#039;non-Flash&#039; category?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does this site come up in the &#8216;non-Flash&#8217; category?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Web50 Judges</title><link>http://web50.ca/2009/11/liam-nickerson/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link> <dc:creator>Web50 Judges</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:44:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://web50.ca/?p=634#comment-91</guid> <description>&lt;b&gt;What we like:&lt;/b&gt; Stunningly beautiful. The sketch book draws its images before your very eyes...like magic! But seriously, it&#039;s very cool. The overall design is great too, with interesting background images and a creative use of the comic book font. The portfolio section is a bit rough (looks like it&#039;s being worked on). But the rest of the site more than makes up for it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>What we like:</b> Stunningly beautiful. The sketch book draws its images before your very eyes&#8230;like magic! But seriously, it&#8217;s very cool. The overall design is great too, with interesting background images and a creative use of the comic book font. The portfolio section is a bit rough (looks like it&#8217;s being worked on). But the rest of the site more than makes up for it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/13 queries in 0.042 seconds using disk

Served from: web50.ca @ 2012-05-18 18:34:32 -->
